Bridging and Validation of the Specific Graves Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life Questionnaire With Health State Utility Values.

OBJECTIVE: In thyroid eye disease (TED), inflammation and expansion of orbital muscle and periorbital fat result in diplopia and proptosis, severely impacting patient quality of life (QOL). The reported health state utility (HSU) scores, which are QOL measures, allow quantification of TED impact and improvement with therapies; however, no current QOL instrument has been validated with HSU scores for TED. Here, we used the disease-specific Graves Ophthalmopathy Quality of Life (GO-QOL) questionnaire and HSU scores to validate QOL impact. METHODS: The GO-QOL scores from patients in 2 randomized, masked, placebo-controlled teprotumumab trials (N=171) were compared with 6 HSU values based on severity of proptosis/diplopia in those studies. Patient GO-QOL and HSU scores were compared at baseline and after 6-month treatment via regression analyses. GO-QOL and HSU scores were correlated for validation and quantification of QOL impact by severity state and to estimate quality-adjusted life year improvement. RESULTS: GO-QOL scores were correlated with TED severity, indicating that worse severity was associated with lower (worse) GO-QOL scores. Less severe health states were represented by higher (better) GO-QOL scores. Importantly, GO-QOL scores were positively correlated with utility scores of the 6 health states, allowing for conversion of the GO-QOL scores to utility scores. A positive (improved) 0.013 utility change was found for each 1-point (positive) improvement in GO-QOL score produced by teprotumumab versus placebo. CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate-to-severe active TED health states demonstrate increasing TED severity associated with declining utility values and worsening GO-QOL scores. These results indicate that the GO-QOL scores can be used to bridge to the HSU scores for benefit quantification.

Economic and Health Care Resource Use Burden of Systemic Sclerosis.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the health care resource use (HCRU) and costs of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) prior to and after diagnosis. METHODS: This retrospective study used a claims data set (Merative MarketScan; 2015-2019). Eligible patients with SSc were identified by diagnosis codes and required at least 24 months of enrollment without an SSc diagnosis before their first SSc claim and at least 12 months of enrollment thereafter. Total HCRU and costs were reported for three intervals: 2 years and 1 year before and 1 year after index diagnosis. A general population cohort without SSc was matched 1:1 to the SSC cohort on age and sex for comparison. RESULTS: Eligibility criteria identified 902 patients with SSc (mean age: 54 years old; 85% female). Mean per-member per year costs increased each year from $22,383 to $29,708 to $47,095, 2 years before, 1 year before, and 1 year after index diagnosis versus $10,232 to $9656 to $9714 in the general population cohort. Outpatient settings represented the largest proportion of cost 1 year after SSc diagnosis ($16,392), followed by prescription drugs ($10,692), physician office ($10,523), and inpatient ($9448) settings. CONCLUSION: Patients with SSC accrued greater costs and required more services than a general population cohort. These elevated expenditures and HCRU were observed at least 2 years before an SSc diagnosis and increased over time, reflecting both the progressive, multisystem nature of SSc and potential challenges in diagnosis. These findings suggest that SSc poses a substantial burden on the US health care system and highlights the need for early diagnosis and effective therapies.

Persistence with Basal-Bolus Insulin Therapy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Effect on Clinical and Economic Outcomes: A Retrospective Claims Database Study.

BACKGROUND: Persistence with multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) may be challenging for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). However, limited information is available regarding the effect of persistence with MDI on outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate persistence with basal and bolus insulin therapy and assess its relationship with clinical and economic outcomes in a real-world setting. METHODS: This retrospective matched cohort study used 2012-2015 data from multiple U.S. commercial health plans (IBM MarketScan). Patients with T2DM aged 18-64 years with ≥ 2 basal and ≥ 2 bolus insulin claims during a 12-month period were eligible for inclusion if they had 18 months of continuous health plan enrollment (6-month baseline and 12-month post-index). Persistence during 12 months post-index was defined using 2 methods: (a) method 1, ≤ 90-day gaps in both basal and bolus insulin claims and (b) method 2, ≥ 1 basal and ≥ 1 bolus insulin claim every quarter (every 90 days) for 4 consecutive quarters after index bolus claim. Propensity score matching was used to match persistent and nonpersistent method 2 cohorts. Mean per-patient all-cause and diabetes-related medical costs (2015 U.S. dollars, excluding outpatient drugs) and health care resource use (HCRU) were calculated. For patients with hemoglobin A1c (A1c) values during baseline and post-index months 10-12, treatment success was defined as (a) A1c decrease from baseline of ≥ 1% and/or (b) baseline A1c ≥ 7% with post-index A1c < 7%. Baseline characteristics of matched cohorts were compared using standardized mean differences (SMDs). Outcome variables were compared using t-tests, chi-square tests, and generalized linear models. RESULTS: Characteristics of 12,882 eligible patients and 12-month persistence rates were similar as defined by method 1 (22.4%) and method 2 (21.1%). After matching, the method 2 cohorts included 2,723 and 8,169 persistent and nonpersistent patients, respectively, with well-balanced baseline characteristics (mean age 53 years; 58% men; all SMDs < 0.1). All-cause annual medical costs were lower for the persistent cohort (mean $13,499 vs. $17,362; P < 0.0001), as were annual diabetes-related costs (mean $6,392 vs. $8,376; P < 0.0001). In persistent versus nonpersistent cohorts, 11% versus 15% of patients, respectively, experienced ≥ 1 hospitalization; 21% versus 24%, respectively, had ≥ 1 ED visit; 9% versus 12%, respectively, experienced ≥ 1 diabetes-related hospitalization; and 13% versus 15%, respectively, had ≥ 1 diabetes-related ED visit (P ≤ 0.005 for all). Mean baseline A1c was similar in persistent and nonpersistent cohorts (9.7% vs. 9.6%, respectively; P = 0.63). Persistence with MDI was associated with greater mean reduction in A1c (-1.3% vs. -0.8%, respectively; P = 0.006) and greater percentages of patients achieving treatment success (55% vs. 39%, respectively, for nonpersistent; P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Poor persistence with basal-bolus insulin therapy over 12 months of follow-up was prevalent and was associated with greater medical costs, greater HCRU, and poorer glycemic control than for patients who were persistent. Interventions are needed to improve persistence with insulin therapy and aid patients with T2DM to achieve glycemic control. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Becton, Dickinson and Company (BD). All authors except Edelman are employees and stockholders of BD. Edelman reports board membership at Senseonics and participation in advisory board/speakers bureau at Lilly USA, MannKind, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis U.S., Merck, and AstraZeneca, all unrelated to this study. A poster for this study was presented at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting 2018; April 23-26, 2018; Boston MA.

Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Multiple Daily Injections of Basal-bolus Insulin (MDI) Therapy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) not achieving hemoglobin (Hb) A1c targets may progress from an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) to added basal insulin and then to multiple daily injections of basal-bolus insulin (MDI); however, the relative clinical and economic burden experienced by patients prescribed MDI for T2DM is not well quantified. The intent of this work was to describe direct medical costs, health care resource utilization, and glycemic control in patients with T2DM exposed to MDI in a clinical practice setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used administrative claims data (2012-2015, United States) from patients aged 18 to 64 years with T2DM prescribed OAD, basal insulin, or MDI therapy. Eligible patients had continuous enrollment from ≥6 months before to 12 months after the date of the index prescription drug claim. Patients eligible for inclusion in the MDI cohort had ≥2 pharmacy claims each for basal and bolus insulin from the index date through the postindex period. Glycemic control, defined as an HbA1c value of <7% during the last 9 postindex months, was assessed in a subset of patients with HbA1c data available from that period. Descriptive analyses were performed. FINDINGS: We identified 225,135 patients with T2DM and claims for an OAD (n = 188,230), basal insulin (n = 23,724), or MDI (n = 13,181). The mean age was 51 or 52 years in each cohort; 54% to 59% of patients in each cohort were men. The mean Charlson comorbidity index scores were 0.8, 1.4, and 1.8, respectively; the percentages of patients with obesity and diabetes-related complications were greatest in the MDI cohort compared with OAD and basal insulin cohorts. The mean direct medical costs (all-cause; year-2015 US $) were $9368 in the OAD cohort, $14,420 in the basal insulin cohort, and $25,624 in the MDI cohort; diabetes-related costs were $3396, $7285, and $13,538. In the OAD, basal insulin, and MDI cohorts, 7%, 9%, and 14% of patients had ≥1 hospitalization, and 17%, 20%, and 24% had ≥1 emergency department visit, while 5%, 7%, and 11% had ≥1 diabetes-related hospitalization, and 8%, 11%, and 15% had ≥1 diabetes-related emergency department visit. Glycemic control was found in 64%, 22%, and 15% of patients in the OAD, basal insulin, and MDI cohorts. IMPLICATIONS: These findings suggest that patients prescribed MDI therapy for T2DM have greater disease burden, experience greater medical costs and health care resource utilization, and exhibit poorer glycemic control than do patients treated with OAD or basal insulin therapy.

Inadequate pain relief among patients with primary knee osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), data on treatment patterns, adequacy of pain relief, and quality of life are limited. The prospective multinational Survey of Osteoarthritis Real World Therapies (SORT) was designed to investigate these aspects. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics and the patient reported outcomes of the Portuguese dataset of SORT at the start of observation. METHODS: Patients ≥50 years with primary knee OA who were receiving oral or topical analgesics were eligible. Patients were enrolled from seven healthcare centers in Portugal between January and December 2011. Pain and function were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and WOMAC. Quality of life was assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Inadequate pain relief (IPR) was defined as a score >4/10 on item 5 of the BPI. RESULTS: Overall, 197 patients were analyzed. The median age was 67.0 years and 78.2% were female. Mean duration of knee OA was 6.2 years. IPR was reported by 51.3% of patients. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio - OR 2.15 [95%CI 1.1, 4.5]), diabetes (OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.3, 7.7]) and depression (OR 2.24 [95%CI 1.2, 4.3]) were associated with higher risk of IPR. Patients with IPR reported worst outcomes in all dimensions of WOMAC (p<0.001) and in all eight domains and summary components of SF-12 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that improvements are needed in the management of pain in knee OA in order to achieve better outcomes in terms of pain relief, function and quality of life.

Inadequate pain relief among patients with primary knee osteoarthritis / Alívio inadequado da dor em pacientes com osteoartrite de joelho primária

ABSTRACT Background: Despite the widespread treatments for osteoarthritis (OA), data on treatment patterns, adequacy of pain relief, and quality of life are limited. The prospective multinational Survey of Osteoarthritis Real World Therapies (SORT) was designed to investigate these aspects. Objectives: To analyze the characteristics and the patient reported outcomes of the Portuguese dataset of SORT at the start of observation. Methods: Patients ≥50 years with primary knee OA who were receiving oral or topical analgesics were eligible. Patients were enrolled from seven healthcare centers in Portugal between January and December 2011. Pain and function were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and WOMAC. Quality of life was assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Inadequate pain relief (IPR) was defined as a score >4/10 on item 5 of the BPI. Results: Overall, 197 patients were analyzed. The median age was 67.0 years and 78.2% were female. Mean duration of knee OA was 6.2 years. IPR was reported by 51.3% of patients. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio - OR 2.15 [95%CI 1.1, 4.5]), diabetes (OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.3, 7.7]) and depression (OR 2.24 [95%CI 1.2, 4.3]) were associated with higher risk of IPR. Patients with IPR reported worst outcomes in all dimensions of WOMAC (p < 0.001) and in all eight domains and summary components of SF-12 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that improvements are needed in the management of pain in knee OA in order to achieve better outcomes in terms of pain relief, function and quality of life.

RESUMO Antecedentes: Apesar dos tratamentos muito difundidos para a osteoartrite (OA), dados sobre os padrões de tratamento, a adequação do alívio da dor e a qualidade de vida são limitados. O estudo multinacional prospectivo Survey of Osteoarthritis Real World Therapies (SORT) foi projetado para investigar esses aspectos. Objetivos: Analisar as características e os desfechos relatados pelo paciente do conjunto de dados português do Sort no início da observação. Métodos: Consideraram-se elegíveis os pacientes com 50 anos ou mais com OA de joelho primária que recebiam analgésicos orais ou tópicos. Os pacientes foram recrutados de sete centros de saúde de Portugal entre janeiro e dezembro de 2011. A dor e a função foram avaliadas pelo Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) e pelo WOMAC. A qualidade de vida foi avaliada com o 12-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). O alívio inadequado da dor (AID) foi definido como uma pontuação > 4/10 no item 5 do BPI. Resultados: Foram analisados 197 pacientes. A idade média foi de 67 anos e 78,2% eram do sexo feminino. A duração média da OA de joelho foi de 6,2 anos. O AID foi relatado por 51,3% dos pacientes. O sexo feminino (odds ratio ajustado - OR 2,15 [IC 95% 1,1-4,5]), o diabetes (OR = 3,1 [IC 95% 1,3-7,7]) e a depressão (OR 2,24 [IC 95% 1,2-4,3]) estiveram associados a um maior risco de AID. Os pacientes com AID relataram piores desfechos em todas as dimensões do Womac (p < 0,001) e em todos os oito domínios e nos dois componentes sumários do SF-12 (p < 0,001). Conclusões: Os resultados do presente estudo indicam que é necessário melhorar o manejo da dor na OA de joelho a fim de alcançar melhores desfechos em termos de alívio da dor, função e qualidade de vida.

Inadequate pain relief among patients with primary knee osteoarthritis. / Alívio inadequado da dor em pacientes com osteoartrite de joelho primária.

BACKGROUND: Despite the widespread treatments for Osteoarthritis (OA), data on treatment patterns, adequacy of pain relief, and quality of life are limited. The prospective multinational Survey of Osteoarthritis Real World Therapies (SORT) was designed to investigate these aspects. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the characteristics and the patient reported outcomes of the Portuguese dataset of SORT at the start of observation. METHODS: Patients ≥ 50 years with primary knee OA who were receiving oral or topical analgesics were eligible. Patients were enrolled from seven healthcare centers in Portugal between January and December 2011. Pain and function were evaluated using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and WOMAC. Quality of life was assessed using the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12). Inadequate Pain Relief (IPR) was defined as a score>4/10 on item 5 of the BPI. RESULTS: Overall, 197 patients were analyzed. The median age was 67.0 years and 78.2% were female. Mean duration of knee OA was 6.2 years. IPR was reported by 51.3% of patients. Female gender (adjusted odds ratio - OR 2.15 [95%CI 1.1, 4.5]), diabetes (OR 3.1 [95%CI 1.3, 7.7]) and depression (OR 2.24 [95%CI 1.2, 4.3]) were associated with higher risk of IPR. Patients with IPR reported worst outcomes in all dimensions of WOMAC (p<0.001) and in all eight domains and summary components of SF-12 (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that improvements are needed in the management of pain in knee OA in order to achieve better outcomes in terms of pain relief, function and quality of life.

Inadequate pain relief and large functional loss among patients with knee osteoarthritis: evidence from a prospective multinational longitudinal study of osteoarthritis real-world therapies.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of inadequate pain relief (IPR) among patients with symptomatic knee OA prescribed analgesic therapy and to characterize patients with IPR. METHODS: Patients ≥50 years old with physician-diagnosed knee OA who had taken topical or oral pain medication for at least 14 days were recruited for this prospective non-interventional study in six European countries. Pain and function were assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) and the WOMAC; quality of life (QoL) was assessed using the 12-item short form. IPR was defined as an average pain score of >4 out of 10 on BPI question 5. RESULTS: Of 1187 patients enrolled, 68% were female and the mean age was 68 years (s.d. 9); 639 (54%) met the definition of IPR. Patient responses for the BPI average pain question were well correlated with responses on the WOMAC pain subscale (Spearman r = 0.64, P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, patients with IPR had greater odds of being female [adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) 1.90 (95% CI 1.46, 2.48)] and having OA in both knees [adjOR 1.48 (95% CI 1.15, 1.90)], higher BMI, longer OA duration, depression or diabetes. Patients with IPR (vs non-IPR) were more likely to have worse QoL, greater function loss and greater pain interference. CONCLUSION: IPR is common among patients with knee OA requiring analgesics and is associated with large functional loss and impaired QoL. Patients at particular risk of IPR, as characterized in this study, may require greater attention towards their analgesic treatment options. TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ (NCT01294696).

A measure of treatment response: patient and physician satisfaction with traditional NSAIDs for osteoarthritis control.

PURPOSE: The clinical response to traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (tNSAIDs) varies substantially. The objective of this study was to describe physicians' and patients' perceptions of response to tNSAIDs as measured by satisfaction with control of patients' osteoarthritis (OA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was undertaken in 2009 in Germany, Spain, and the UK. Linked physician and patient questionnaires collected data on OA management, degree of pain and disability, and satisfaction with OA control. RESULTS: The study included 363 treating physicians and 713 patients receiving tNSAIDs. Patient mean (standard deviation) age was 65.5 (11.0) years (range 36-94 years); 60% were women; 86% were white; and one-quarter were obese. Dissatisfaction with control of patients' OA was expressed by physicians or their patients, or both, for 51% of patients, including 208 patients (31%) with mild OA and 478 patients (60%) with moderate or severe OA. Overall, 37% of patients reported dissatisfaction and 34% had a physician who reported dissatisfaction. Patient and physician assessments were the same in 70% of cases; Cohen's κ coefficient was 0.34 (95% confidence interval 0.26-0.41), indicating fair agreement. Of those reporting dissatisfaction, most physicians (79%) and patients (64%) believed that the current control was the best that could be achieved. The most common reasons for which physicians reported dissatisfaction were inadequate response (56%), side effects (11.1%), and poor tolerance (7.8%). CONCLUSION: One-half of patients or their treating physicians were dissatisfied with the control of OA provided by tNSAID therapy; moreover, most believed it was the best control that could be achieved.

How do physicians weigh benefits and risks associated with treatments in patients with osteoarthritis in the United Kingdom?

OBJECTIVE: To quantify the relative importance that UK physicians attach to the benefits and risks of current drugs when making treatment decisions for patients with osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Physicians treating at least 10 patients with OA per month completed an online discrete-choice experiment survey and answered 12 treatment-choice questions comparing medication profiles. Medication profiles were defined by 4 benefits (reduction in ambulatory pain, resting pain, stiffness, and difficulty doing daily activities) and 3 treatment-related risks [bleeding ulcer, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI)]. Each physician made medication choices for 3 of 9 hypothetical patients (varied by age, history of MI, hypertension, and history of gastrointestinal bleeding). Importance weights were estimated using a random-parameters logit model. Treatment-related risks physicians were willing to accept in exchange for various reductions in ambulatory and resting pain also were calculated. RESULTS: The final sample was 475. A reduction in ambulatory pain from 75 mm to 25 mm (1.6 units) was 1.1 times as important as an increase in MI risk from 0% to 1.5% (1.5 units). The greatest importance was for eliminating a 3% treatment-related risk of MI or stroke. On average, physicians were willing to accept an increase in bleeding ulcer risk of 0.7% (95% CI 0.4%-1.7%) for a reduction in ambulatory pain of 75 mm to 50 mm. CONCLUSION: When presented with well-known benefits and risks of OA treatments, physicians placed greater importance on the risks than on the analgesic properties of the drug. This has implications for the reporting of the results of clinical research to physicians.

Definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritic pain: an analytical literature review of the smallest detectable difference, the minimal detectable change, and the minimal clinically important difference on the pain visual analog scale.

Our objective was to develop a working definition of nonresponse to analgesic treatment of arthritis, focusing on the measurement of pain on the 0-100 mm pain visual analog scale (VAS). We reviewed the literature to assess the smallest detectable difference (SDD), the minimal detectable change (MDC), and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The SDD for improvement reported in three studies of rheumatoid arthritis was 18.6, 19.0, and 20.0. The median MDC was 25.4 for 7 studies of osteoarthritis and 5 studies of rheumatoid arthritis (calculated for a reliability coefficient of 0.85). The MCID increased with increasing baseline pain score. For baseline VAS tertiles defined by scores of 30-49, 50-65, and >65, the MCID for improvement was, respectively, 7-11 units, 19-27 units, and 29-37 units. Nonresponse can thus be defined in terms of the MDC for low baseline pain scores and in terms of the MCID for high baseline scores.

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Etoricoxib versus Celecoxib and Nonselective NSAIDs in the Treatment of Ankylosing Spondylitis in Norway.

Objectives. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of etoricoxib (90 mg) relative to celecoxib (200/400 mg), and the nonselective NSAIDs naproxen (1000 mg) and diclofenac (150 mg) in the initial treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Norway. Methods. A previously developed Markov state-transition model was used to estimate costs and benefits associated with initiating treatment with the different competing NSAIDs. Efficacy, gastrointestinal and cardiovascular safety, and resource use data were obtained from the literature. Data from different studies were synthesized and translated into direct costs and quality adjusted life years by means of a Bayesian comprehensive decision modeling approach. Results. Over a 30-year time horizon, etoricoxib is associated with about 0.4 more quality adjusted life years than the other interventions. At 1 year, naproxen is the most cost-saving strategy. However, etoricoxib is cost and quality adjusted life year saving relative to celecoxib, as well as diclofenac and naproxen after 5 years of follow-up. For a willingness-to-pay ceiling ratio of 200,000 Norwegian krones per quality adjusted life year, there is a >95% probability that etoricoxib is the most-cost-effective treatment when a time horizon of 5 or more years is considered. Conclusions. Etoricoxib is the most cost-effective NSAID for initiating treatment of ankylosing spondylitis in Norway.

Suboptimal persistence with inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy among children with persistent asthma in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Long-term studies indicate that adherence to asthma controller therapy decreases over time, and persistence with therapy may be poor. METHODS: This primary care database study assessed persistence with therapy over one year after first prescription of inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) for children aged 2-14 years with a diagnosis of asthma. Children with intermittent asthma were excluded. Discontinuation was defined as no ICS prescription during the last three months of the follow-up year. RESULTS: 2220 of 7375 children receiving a first prescription for ICS had persistent asthma. Mean (±SD) age was 7.3 (±3.8) years; 59.5% were male. A total of 745 (33.6%) continued initial ICS, 133 (6.0%) received add-on therapy, 150 (6.8%) switched to another asthma therapy, and 1192 (53.7%) discontinued therapy. These percentages were similar for children aged 2-5 or 6-14 years. CONCLUSION: Persistence with first-time ICS monotherapy is poor among children with persistent asthma.

Correlations of striatal dopamine synthesis with default network deactivations during working memory in younger adults.

Age-related deficits have been demonstrated in working memory performance and in the dopamine system thought to support it. We performed positron emission tomography (PET) scans on 12 younger (mean 22.7 years) and 19 older (mean 65.8 years) adults using the radiotracer 6-[(18)F]-fluoro-L-m-tyrosine (FMT), which measures dopamine synthesis capacity. Subjects also underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing a delayed recognition working memory task. We evaluated age-related fMRI activity differences and examined how they related to FMT signal variations in dorsal caudate within each age group. In posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus (PCC/Pc), older adults showed diminished fMRI deactivations during memory recognition compared with younger adults. Greater task-induced deactivation (in younger adults only) was associated both with higher FMT signal and with worse memory performance. Our results suggest that dopamine synthesis helps modulate default network activity in younger adults and that alterations to the dopamine system may contribute to age-related changes in working memory function.

Frequency of diagnosis and treatment of allergic rhinitis among adults with asthma in Germany, France, and the UK: National Health and Wellness Survey.

BACKGROUND: Concomitant allergic rhinitis (AR) adds to the symptomatic burden of asthma. SCOPE: To determine the proportion of adults with concomitant asthma and AR whose AR is diagnosed and/or treated, data were derived from a cross-sectional, stratified, random sample of 26,468 adults from France, Germany and the UK, participants in the 2004 web-based National Health and Wellness Survey. Patients were drawn from the database if they reported (1) experiencing asthma in the prior 12 months, (2) a physician diagnosis of asthma, and (3) ever experiencing 'nasal allergies/hay fever' (physician diagnosed or self-reported symptoms). FINDINGS: Of 1139 patients with asthma who reported AR, 203 (18%) did not have a diagnosis of AR. Of these, 86 (42%) pursued over-the-counter self-treatment for AR, and 117 (58%) remained untreated. Of 936 patients who reported diagnosed AR, 471 (50%) received AR prescriptions, 200 (21%) pursued over-the-counter self-treatment, and 265 (28%) remained untreated. Overall, 34% of patients with asthma and diagnosed or self-reported AR were not treated for AR. There were no significant differences in QoL over the prior 4 weeks, nor healthcare resource use over the prior 6 months between patients treated and those not treated for AR. CONCLUSION: Based on self-reported data, despite global treatment guidelines recommending evaluation and treatment of AR among patients with asthma, AR was not diagnosed for 1 in 5 patients, and AR was not treated for 1 in 3 patients with asthma.

Rates of asthma attacks in patients with previously inadequately controlled mild asthma treated in clinical practice with combination drug therapy: an exploratory post-hoc analysis.

BACKGROUND: Differences could exist in the likelihood of asthma attacks in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS), long-acting beta-agonist (LABA), and montelukast (MON) (ICS/LABA/MON) and patients treated with an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) and montelukast (MON) (ICS/MON). METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of a pretest-posttest retrospective cohort study. Patients with mild persistent asthma and allergic rhinitis, who were taking an ICS either alone or in combination with a LABA, started concomitant MON treatment as part of their routine care. Rates of asthma- and allergic rhinitis-related medical resource use in the 12-months after the initial (index) MON prescription were compared in the ICS/MON and ICS/LABA/MON groups. An asthma attack was defined as an asthma-related hospitalization, ER visit, or use of an oral corticosteroid. RESULTS: Of the total of 344 patients, 181 (53%) received ICS/MON and 163 (47%) received ICS/LABA/MON in the post-index period for means of 10.5 and 11.4 months, respectively, (P < 0.05). Short-acting beta-agonists were used by 74.6% in the ICS/MON and 71.8% in the ICS/LABA/MON groups (P > 0.05). An asthma attack occurred in 4.4% of the ICS/MON group and 6.8% of the ICS/LABA/MON group (P > 0.05). The adjusted odds of an asthma attack in the post-index period in the ICS/LABA/MON group relative to the ICS/MON group was 1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.35-4.44. CONCLUSION: In this observational study of combination drug treatment of mild persistent asthma and allergic rhinitis, no difference was observed between LABA/ICS/MON combination therapy and the ICS/MON combination without LABA use, for the rate of asthma attacks over one year.

Impact of smoking on asthma symptoms, healthcare resource use, and quality of life outcomes in adults with persistent asthma.

BACKGROUND: Smoking habits of asthmatics are similar to those of the general population. However, little attention has been paid to the associations between smoking and asthma-related outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate relationships between cigarette smoking, asthma symptoms, and asthma-related resource utilization in subjects with persistent asthma. METHOD: A stratified, random sample of adults from France, Germany, and the UK with persistent asthma were surveyed in 2001 through 2004. Statistical analyses compared asthma symptoms and healthcare resource utilization for cigarette smokers compared with those for non-smokers. RESULTS: Analyses included 1109 subjects with persistent asthma symptoms in 2001-2003 and 852 subjects with persistent asthma symptoms in 2004. Using multivariate analysis of data from eligible subjects in 2004 that did not have concomitant chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and adjusting for subjects' baseline and demographic characteristics, cigarette smokers were more likely to experience nighttime symptoms (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.07, 1.97 P = 0.015) and were more likely to use healthcare resources than were non-smokers (P < or = 0.004). Findings were similar in a secondary analysis of subjects < or =55 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Cigarette smoking appears to be associated with more asthma symptoms and more ED visits and hospitalizations in adults with persistent asthma.

The association of consumer expectations, experiences and satisfaction with newly prescribed medications.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between medication expectations and subsequent experience on treatment satisfaction and intention to continue using the medication. METHODS: A longitudinal study with two surveys administered to each patient. Patients prescribed a new medication were recruited in pharmacies within Michigan. Medication-related expectations were evaluated at baseline. Experiences, satisfaction and intent to continue were evaluated a month later. Analyses used included factorial ANOVA models, multiple linear regressions and structural equation modeling (SEM). Impact of satisfaction on intention to continue was evaluated using correlation analysis and SEM. RESULTS: A total of 344 usable responses were obtained. SEM showed that expectation scores were not associated with both experience (path coefficient = 0.10) and satisfaction (path coefficient = 0.02, NS). On the other hand, experience was strongly associated with satisfaction (path coefficient = 0.89) and satisfaction was strongly associated with intent to continue using the new medication (path coefficient = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: This study empirically supports the value of the patient's experience and its contribution to satisfaction, which in turn is associated with intended continued use mainly due to greater effectiveness of the newly prescribed medication. Satisfied consumers should be more adherent, thus enhancing the probability of positive therapeutic outcomes.

Asthma control in patients with asthma and allergic rhinitis receiving add-on montelukast therapy for 12 months: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Montelukast, a potent leukotriene receptor antagonist, is approved for treatment of both asthma and allergic rhinitis (AR). No studies to date have examined whether montelukast can improve asthma control over a long period of time in patients with seasonal AR and asthma. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate asthma control and use of asthma-related medical resources by patients with inadequately controlled mild to moderate persistent asthma and seasonal AR who required addition of montelukast as part of routine care. METHODS: This multicenter, 24-month, pre-post retrospective observational study included patients receiving current inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy (alone or in combination with long-acting beta-agonist [LABA]), who received add-on treatment with montelukast for 12 consecutive months. The incidence of asthma attacks, defined as emergency department visit, hospitalization, or oral corticosteroid use for asthma, was compared for the year before and the year after addition of montelukast to therapy. RESULTS: For the 696 patients from Italy, Poland, and Spain who were included in the analyses, the proportion of patients experiencing an asthma attack declined from 31.5% in the year before to 10.1% (p < 0.001) the year after addition of montelukast to therapy. Proportions of patients with an asthma-related emergency room visit, hospitalization, and oral corticosteroid use declined from 18.7% to 3.9%, from 5.2% to 1.4%, and from 17.5% to 5.9% (all p < 0.01), respectively. The incidence of these outcomes declined in all three countries, regardless of baseline asthma severity or asthma therapy (ICS alone or ICS + LABA). Important study limitations include the possibility of selection bias or missing medical chart data in this retrospective study design. Also noteworthy is the inclusion of only those patients who remained persistent with montelukast therapy. Therefore, the results of the study are relevant for patients who remain persistent with montelukast therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of montelukast to current ICS therapy improved long-term asthma control and resulted in substantial reductions in asthma-related resource use by patients with mild or moderate persistent asthma and concomitant seasonal AR who were persistent with montelukast therapy in this retrospective observational study.

The bases of goal setting in the self-regulation of hypertension.

We apply a new methodology to investigate goal setting by hypertensive patients that uncovers the reasons why people have a goal to manage hypertension or not (e.g. to reduce/maintain one's current blood pressure). The reasons are found to consist of superordinate goals in support of one's focal hypertension goal and the hierarchical mental network underlying the superordinate goals. We show that, not only do such superordinate goals influence patients' beliefs, feelings and decisions, but the relationships among superordinate goals are particularly efficacious in the formation of beliefs and attitudes, as well as intentions to self-regulate hypertension and actual efforts in doing so. Hypotheses were tested on a sample of 219 patients at a university-based hypertension clinic.